The case laws on temporary resicence ordinance 2015 Diaries

The case laws on temporary resicence ordinance 2015 Diaries

Blog Article

Article 199 with the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other sufficient remedy is provided by regulation." It truly is effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust accessible remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, It's also a perfectly-set up proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is subject matter to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings within the evidence.

Life imprisonment is definitely an alternative to the death penalty. In this sort of cases, the convicted person is sentenced to invest the remainder of their natural life behind bars.

The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed in the bank and considering that only the appellants were posted on the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )

Now it is well-settled that considerations for pre-arrest and post-arrest bail are fully different, therefore, in our view the acquired Judge had fallen in error to cancel the bail allowed to petitioner because of the same Additional Sessions Judge.”

For that foregoing reasons the instant suit is dismissed with no order regarding cost. Office to prepare decree in the above terms. Read more

be set up without an iota of doubt in all other jurisdictions) will be inferred. This is often a horrifying reality, a particularly very low threshold for an offence that carries capital punishment.

The appellant should have remained vigilant and raised his challenge towards the Judgment within time. Read more

9.  Needless to mention that any observations made in the above order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.

When the petitioner is actually present on the place of occurrence without causing any injury into the deceased or PWs then in these types of circumstances, whether He's vicariously liable shall be decided through the learned trial Court after recording of your evidence.

In the event the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had an opportunity to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is usually only performed When the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence along with the petitioner company responded into the allegations as such they were well mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to generally be seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

share or interest of the co-owner in immovable property may sold to here another co-owner/co-sharer or even to an stranger and section forty four(Transfer of Property Act 1882)

The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary towards the determination with the current case are called obiter dicta, which constitute persuasive authority but are usually not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil legislation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[four]